Differences in body weight

It is a fact that the body weight is subject to irregular changes without apparently immediate involvement from us through quantity or quality of food intake or physical exercise and scientifically it could not be confirmed even today, the reason for variations. These annual changes are amounting to about 2 – 3% difference of the body weight. Other short term variations of weight have to do with female cycles and with illnesses and are completely independent of the regular differences of annual variations. Of course, longer term quantity of nutrition has an influence on weight changes, as well as psychological factors like stress. The body reacts quite flexibly if food intake is reduced and responds with increased levels of utilization of food – to be slimming is not part in the genetically provided package to overcome times of abundancies.

This is a subject of utmost importance because the food industry needs an explanation as well as the doctor and the fitness trainer in order not to mislead diagnoses. Medical research appears to be especially confused. Countless reports and abstracts in the Internet are indicating this lively interest of universities, healthy nutrition centres, fitness trainers and sociologists.

Some reports make you smile: for instance, when a Dutch institute for nutrition were scrutinizing tribal folk in Africa and trying to see connections between social deprivation and fluctuating body weight levels.

In another study Japanese researchers put 500 women into a compound and distributed the same quantity and quality of food every day as well as allowing the same hours of sleep in order to observe if weight levels would differ. Yes, they differed still.

Japanese researchers also put a northern Japanese group of seals under a measured diet, because an annual weight difference of 30 – 40% is unexplainable - without result.

American University members obviously were trotting with cattle to observe unusual habits of weight loss – even today they could not help farmers to increase the return on investment.

Germany’s well disciplined researchers don’t go easily away without answer: they got involved with birds and found the reason for weight differences: they are rooted from circadian cycles. (The term ‘circadian’ is used to refer to prehistoric ages of different time scales and is used by scientists, I may add a bit cynica, if there is no answer.)

Less smiles are allowed for some American and European universities, which are relating weight differences to cardiologic problems, especially for children and advice about medical renal treatments and diuretic and antidiuretic pills. (The word ‘obese’ doesn’t exist in American University language, I assume, probably for discriminatory reasons. Especially American children suffer under obesity, as every visitor notices when visiting America). Such advice is dangerous, because differing weight level is a healthy inter-cell metabolic exercise and to interfere naively is irresponsible. An unusually high difference of weight levels is indicating more likely that the metabolism desperately struggles against the intake of unhealthy food and lack of movement. This advice is not to be found in any abstract of American universities.

There is an excellent scientific book written about the Moon and is also called ‘Moon’ by Rick Stroud, an Oxford trained scientist and Radio/TV documentarian. Besides most valuable information, he insists there is no influence of the Moon on differing liquidity or weight levels and puts calculations and arguments forward, but accepts the influence on the earthly tides of the oceans.

Here is the answer to the question of differing weight levels: The differing weight level relates to all multicellers and not to single wise living biological cells. It is one of the elementary patterns, about 1.2 billion of years old, and is directed to the fertilization process of the female ovum. At fertilization stage it increases the weight of the motherly ovum: it is the readiness of the ovum to complete the fertilization process. The additional liquidity supplied to the ovum through gravity of the moon during conception may soften or confuse hormonally the prehistorically conditioned resistance and hostility towards the accessing sperm. This is the conception and the most convincing theory.

 

This diagram shows the weight difference of a male over the period of one year. The values on left side are kilograms; below are 360 days divided into 12 Zodiac signs, each consisting of 30 degrees or 30days. As application of synodic timing (earthbound) time correspondents with applied sidereal time, it indicates strongly, that multicellular life has been created on Earth and not somewhere in the Universe. The averaged values of the diagram are originating from 13 years of registration and are stable also in the case of sudden social or health implications. The max. annual difference is about 2.5kgs. We are noting that the weight differences are of gravitational influence. This we are stating because all peaks and troughs are on the opposite position just showing the opposite value, the ebb and tide effect.

Each Zodiac sign contains 30 days. Each dotted vertical line equals 3 days of the year and as each Zodiac sign consists of 10 vertical lines; this adds up to 30 days. Therefore Zodiac 5, for instance, is the half of the Virgo cycle = 15 days. Zodiac sign Virgo commences at 23rd of August, Virgo 5 states the half and this equals 15 days and is therefore 5 – 7th of September. Between 5th and 7th of September the test person reaches the highest point of annual weight, whatever the basic weight may be. (During these 13 years the permanent weight level of the test person has been increased by more than 10kgs., but this fact doesn’t influence the shape of the curves. The shape of the curves is slightly altered, however, by changing characteristics and repeated physical undertakings like travel at the same time ). This analysis is based on the rotation of the Sun.

With the same diagram I can also apply a different reading. If we base the analysis on the rotation of the Moon, the whole period is either 27.32 degrees/days long, as sidereal timing, or 29.52 days as synodic timing. This is the time for the Moon to rotate a full circle in any month from Aries to Pisces. (The vertical pointed lines, each at value of 3 days, have to be disregarded for this exercise as now the subdivisions of 27.32 (sidereal) or 29.52 (synodic) days are ruling). This leads us into answer for the conception. In this case one needs to have the knowledge of the month of conception. The highest point (of weight) represents the Moon position of the month of conception and in this example the half – Virgo5 – is about 13-14 degree in Virgo (sidereal) or 14-15 degree in Virgo. This is somehow complicated and requires more efforts to explain. However, whereas for setting of Elementary Patterns the sidereal time makes sense; for the conception we achieve more precision with application of Earth time, the synodic time. The conclusion doesn’t allow doubts: Multicellular life has been created on this Earth. One more point may be mentioned. With this diagram it is possible to reflect the day of the year of the highest weight level (Sun); on the other hand it indicates precisely the part of the day when the conception took place. (Moon) This is parallelism of time in the original sense.

2 – 4 days after conception the liquidity levels are starting to be normalized and the blastocyst (after the phase of zygote) has moved to the uterus. The cells are starting to clone through traditional cell division and there arises one problem: there was nothing provided to activate metabolism in between cells – inter-cell metabolism - and the Blastocyst is in danger of being drowned in it own waste. The multicellular Blastocyst containing about 150 cells turned to the gravitational force of the Moon to pump in and out water, like tides.

This leads to an increase once again minimally the level of liquidity of blastocyst cells. In its later life the female or male multicellular organism, is ‘stamped’ for life with this pattern, the variation of annual weight as elementary pattern as remnant of the conception and the first confrontations of the blastocyst to apply intercell metabolism. What originally was a tiny increase of weight for the ovum and later the few cells of the blastocyst, becomes for the organism of the new life a fluctuation of weight of 2-3% on an annual basis.

Nature tends to balance extremes and this applies also in the case of this annual weight level. After half a year when the annual Sun position reaches the opposing position of conception, the weight of the new fertilized foetus and of an adult person has fallen to its lowest level. 2 – 4 days later it reaches one more low point of the year reminding us of the first intercell metabolism. If we add up the peaks of weight with the complementary troughs six months later and divide the result by 2, both these results confirm our average weight level. This relates similar to the tide of oceans, only in this case it is not a 6 hour repetition of flood and ebb but a 6-monthly event.

In order not to be misunderstood: Ovulation and menstruation trigger lunar monthly a weight increase for women, but this is irrelevant for annual averages and not subject of this writing. Weight differences which are here described are not directed by female ovulation or menstruation, because they are valid for the new life of both sexes. They are based on the fertilization of the motherly ovum. It is the motherly ovum of the new life which adds an immeasurable tiny amount of liquidity because the same ovum is (after successful conception) the body builder for both sexes.

The difference in weight will percentage wise vary inside the same species and more with other organic multicellular forms of life, but by the principle, the average increase of weight, will be heading during the semi-annual period towards the peak and thereafter back to the trough.

The sexual reproduction as an evolutionary and mutative trial to gain additional strength of survival, took the specific gravity of the Moon as help to merge genetically 2 cells, which are historically hostile to each other to create new organic variations.

There is another point of view which is significant. Sun and Moon are in a true sense creators of multicellular life. Their rotational movements are intertwined with regard to the conception.To clarify this: to find the time of conception we need to find it via the peak level of annual weight. This is Sun-measured on sidereal timing – Sun timing and shows us the day in question. This will give us the day and the month. This itself has nothing to do with conception. We are holding a key in our hands, that is all. The same degree of the Zodiac sign but for the Moon rotation, not the Sun, is the point of conception. Of course, there are applying two different time levels.

The Sun/Earth is measured on sidereal basis and annually, The Moon is measured lunar monthly and synodically timed, the Earth timing shows the best result.

Sexual reproduction as an evolutionary mutative trial to gain additional strength to survive after a long spell of a hardly habitable Earth before the Precambrian period used the specific gravitation of the moon to unite two, by principle, hostile cells for a short truce to create new variations of life.

The trial succeeded but the result is questionable. The disharmonic foundation of cells in a truce only cannot be silenced and upcoming multicellular challengers on Earth are coined by destructive tendencies, and more painful for the subjects affected, overshadowed by mortality.

This is our uniqueness on Earth. There is no question about creation of multicellular life. It happened on Earth and not somewhere in the Universe.

However, the original life has not been created on Earth, that is similarly clear. The cells have arrived on Earth after long migration throughout the Universe.

Biological cells of earlier development may have been widespread on Earth, but the special gravity of the moon at a time of very harsh conditions to survive and desperately in search of mutative escape routes, simple cells became refined to Eukaryote cells.

It is doubtful that higher developed Eukaryotes are settled or originated in the Universe.
That means that in the depth of the Universe other simple biological cells could well have chosen a far reaching mutative route and, who knows, perhaps they are happier with their creation as we, born in hidden hostility, in shape and form limited and destructive by nature and what only remains is Pandora’s vague hope.